Priorities and Unmet Needs of Endometriosis Management


Priorities and Unmet Needs of Endometriosis Management

Recent Round-table Discussion regarding Endometriosis: Obstacles and Priorities to Achieve

Key Points

Highlights:

  • Comprehensive and interdisciplinary methods to endometriosis management along with research that give insights into the underlying biology of the disease are greatly needed to improve quality-driven care.

Key results:

  • Many socioeconomic and medical obstacles have prevented appropriate and effective endometriosis-related management. These include high costs, insurance issues, stigma, lack of primary care provider education, and access to specialists.
  • Future treatments and care should shift toward a patient-centric, multidisciplinary approach that focuses on the patient as a whole, rather than one symptom.
  • More research is needed to better understand the underlying physiology of endometriosis and its various clinical presentations.

What’s done here?

  • The Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR) has formed a multi-disciplinary roundtable to discuss current unmet needs, priorities, and obstacles of endometriosis management.

Limitations:

  • This is a summative paper of the dialogue that was present in a recent meeting amongst professionals involved in endometriosis research and management.

Lay Summary

Endometriosis is a systemic, chronic disease that is a significant contributor to morbidity in young women. Although endometriosis has gained increasing attention in the medical field, scientific progress for an effective and definitive treatment modality is progressing slowly. The Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR), a non-profit organization, aimed to aid the current understanding of this disease, has designed a roundtable meeting to review both the diagnostics and treatment of endometriosis. An interdisciplinary dialogue between researchers, clinicians, patients, industry, and government officials has yielded further insight into the priorities for the future and obstacles to overcome.

Diagnostic delays remain a significant area of improvement in the appropriate management of endometriosis. However, several societies around the world have aimed to dispel some of the stigma surrounding menstrual issues so that women can seek medical help sooner.  According to this meeting, adequate evaluation of chronic pelvic pain is another area of improvement that needs to be addressed. On average, women with endometriosis make several visits to their primary care provider before being referred to specialists and up to 75% experience a misdiagnosis. This delay in diagnosis is even more delayed in women under the age of 19.

The diagnosis of endometriosis is a topic that is widely being discussed. Current gold standard laparoscopy with histopathologic confirmation is invasive and costly. Thus, noninvasive methods are actively being investigated such as imaging techniques and blood-based biomarkers. However, due to the heterogeneity of the disease, finding specific markers for all forms of endometriosis has been difficult to achieve.

Available medical therapies including NSAIDs, OCPs, and GnRH analogs provide partial relief from endometriosis-related pain for many women, but not all. Many of these medical therapies cannot be used when women are trying to get pregnant. Additionally, even after the removal of lesions with laparoscopy, disease recurrence is common and ranges from 30-50%. Even women who have undergone hysterectomy +/- ovary removal can suffer from recurrence.

Taking into account all of these issues, it is imperative that the medical and non-medical community continue to work in a cooperative manner so that these obstacles can be overcome for the benefit of women around the world who suffer from endometriosis.


Research Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30790565


endometriosis discussion obstacles current research

DISCLAIMER

Endonews is designed to strictly highlight the most recently published scientific research that focuses on endometriosis. It is not designed to provide medical advice or an opinion on the best form of treatment. We highly stress the importance of not using this site as a substitute for seeking an experienced physician, which is highly recommended if you have any questions or concerns regarding your endometriosis needs. We believe in the consciousness of our reader to discriminate that research is different than "standard of care," and trust that they can keep in mind that here at Endonews, we summarize the newest peer-reviewed scientific medical literature, without bias.